Research Ethics Review

Between approximately 2005-2010 this was the official site of the Research Ethics Review. This page was created from achieved content. You can view this site strictly for its historical context or use the information presented in a useful manner. ;

Research Ethics Review (RER) is the official journal of The Association of Research Ethics Committees (http://arec.org.uk/). The journal is designed for all readers interested in research ethics and the procedures and process of ethical review, whether aligned to the NHS or within the university or independent sector.

RER will publish original papers and review articles as well as informative case studies. The quality of submitted articles will be evaluated independently by double-blind peer-review.

The editors encourage the submission of:

  • Original papers addressing issues which relate either to the process of ethical review in research or to the procedures that underpin ethics committee activity (up to 3000 words, but longer articles are not excluded).
  • Case studies that provide examples of ethical review highlighting the practicalities and issues that engender committee discussion and debate (1500 words).
  • Short reports about specific initiatives to improve practice (500-600 words).
  • Review articles that address key issues in research ethics or which focus on under-researched topics (3000 words) are also of interest.

Email enquiries or papers to the Editor.

Download or view details of the scope of the journal and editorial policy in pdf format (35 Kb). Click here to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader.

Research Ethics Review is published on behalf of The Association of Research Ethics Committees (AREC).

SUBSCRIPTIONS (2010): Print Only £75, Print and electronic £90, Electronic only £65. Please download our order-form and full rates by right-clicking the link and saving to your computer. Return the form toSmith-Gordon publishers.

+++

Guidelines for authors

The instructions below give some information about how contributions should be presented.

If any of these need clarification or amplification please contact the editors.

The manuscript. Papers should be sent electronically as a word document to the editor (see box at end of these notes). If papers are sent by post, submission needs to take the form of a diskette comprising a word document and an identical printed copy. An acknowledgement of receipt will be sent to the corresponding author.

Copyright and good practice. Papers are assumed to be submitted exclusively to the journal unless otherwise stated and, on acceptance, they become the copyright of The Association of Research Ethics Committees. Papers based on primary research must comply with appropriate research governance and ethical approval.

Authorship. In line with the uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to bio-medical journals authorship credit should be based only on substantial contribution to the following: Conception and design, or data acquisition, or analysis and interpretation of data, and Drafting the paper or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and Final approval of the submitted manuscript. All three of these conditions must be met. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.

Review process. All research papers submitted for publication will be subject to peer review. The turnaround time for papers will be up to six to eight weeks from submission to decision and up to 12 weeks from decision to publication, with a fast-track process also available. This will be an audited process. The editor reserves the right to make minor adjustments and, if necessary, to shorten the article without changing the meaning.

Permission to reproduce previously published material must be obtained in writing from the copyright holder and the original source should be acknowledged in the manuscript.

 

Presentation of Contributions

General. Topics within the remit of the journal should be presented clearly and concisely and must be written in a gender-free, non-discriminatory style.

The manuscript layout must be presented in the following order: Title page must contain Abstract (or summary for case reports) max 300 words, Text, Acknowledgments, Competing interests etc, References, Tables, Figures, and Appendices.

The title page must contain the following information. The title should be clearly listed in upper and lower-case characters without unnecessary capital letters. Give name, postal address, e-mail, telephone and fax numbers of the corresponding author. The full names, institutions, city, and country of all coauthors should be listed.

Headings and subheadings. These should be sufficient but not excessive. Principal headings should range left above following text and in bold type (Methods) and subheadings range left above text in italic (Statistics). Third-order headings should be typed in italic at the beginning of the relevant paragraph (examples above in the text of these guidelines). Third-order headings may follow principal headings with or without interposition of subheadings.

 

Useful points of style

Bullet points and abbreviations. Begin items with a capital letter and follow normal syntax and sentence construction. When first using abbreviations in the text, the term the author wishes to abbreviate should be spelt out in full with its abbreviation in brackets. Thereafter the abbreviation can and should be used.Abbreviations should normally be in capital letters and unpunctuated.

Spelling should be consistent and follow either, but not both, standard UK and American dictionaries. We use the -ize form rather than -ise for verbs (-yse remains -yse).

Numbers are spelt out up to and including ten and should be typed as follows: 1001, 10 001, 123 456001. However SI units are always numbers eg 7 g not seven g.

Punctuation. Avoid capital (upper case) letters at all times except for proper names, ie government, university but Durham University. Avoid punctuation of abbreviations and acronyms, ie and eg, not i.e. and

e.g., USA not U.S.A. Do not use italics for common Latin or other foreign words, eg in vitro not in vitro.

It is of further assistance if authors double check comma use especially hanging parentheses. Do not underline in text and do not use hard carriage returns at end of lines except at end of paragraphs.

 

References

Cite in numerical order in text inside square brackets, eg [1, 17–24, 77]. List references by number at end of text (more than three authors may be cited as Jones, Howe, Lee et al). Unpublished and personal references appear only in text.

For journals use:

1 Wagner DR, Heyward DH. Measures of body composition in blacks and whites: a comparative review.

Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 71: 1392–1402.

For books:

2 Forbes GB. Human body composition. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987.

Book chapter:

3 Willet WC. Use of biomarkers in nutrition. In Kok FJ, Veer PV, eds. Biomarkers of dietary exposure.

London: Smith-Gordon, 1991: 9–14.

Please list legal references in the standard style followed in legal journals.

Web-based references should contain the year or full date of access.

Tables

Tables should be set out on separate pages, with their legend above, and numbered in sequence in which they appear (Table 1, 2 etc). Do not duplicate text. Place supporting information in title. Define units in footnotes using a,b,c, Use * ** for probability.

Figures

Make sure that large Figures will be satisfactory when reduced to print. Examine especially lettering and scales for size. If supplied electronically graphics should be saved as high resolution (at least 300 dpi) files saved as .eps or .tif format. Do not submit colour figures. List Figure titles on a separate sheet. Indicate abbreviations and units. Acknowledge sources of published figures. Permission to reproduce the work of others is the author’s responsibility. Make sure lettering is both correct and consistent with text.

Proofs and offprints

Proofs will be sent as PDF (Adobe Acrobat©) to the author submitting the paper and must be returned promptly. This will allow for correction of essential and typographical errors. Major changes will not be entertained and the journal may publish the uncorrected paper if the author does not comply.

There are no page charges. Free offprints are not supplied. An order-form (minimum 50 copies) and price list will be supplied with proofs.

Correspondence and enquiries

All written correspondence should be addressed to:

The Editor, Research Ethics Review, AREC, ‘Stepping Stones’ (1st floor), c/o South Staffordshire Healthcare NHS Trust,

Trust Headquarters, Corporation Street,

Stafford ST16 3AG.

Contact the publisher at publisher@smithgordon.com

 

Research-Ethics-Review.com